note-taking
Evernote open source alternatives
Evernote starts at $10.99/mo. Here are 6 open-source alternatives — ranked, opinionated, and refreshed daily against the GitHub API. No paid placements in the rankings. No AI-slop lists.
Comparison table (live data)
GitHub metrics snapshot: 2026-10-11
| Project | Stars | Activity |
|---|---|---|
| AppFlowy The open source alternative to Notion. | 77.2k | This week |
| Logseq A privacy-first, open-source platform for knowledge management and collaboration. | 45.2k | This week |
| Trilium Notes Hierarchical note-taking application with focus on building large personal knowledge bases. | 2.9k | Over 1yr |
| — | ? | |
| — | ? | |
| — | ? |
The one thesis that will save you a week
The core question for an Evernote refugee is not “which app has the most features?” It is “where do I want my notes to live, and how much complexity am I willing to own?” Evernote gives you a polished hosted service, but its free tier is now limited to one device and 50 notes, while the entry paid tier starts at $10.99 per month. The alternatives here split into three camps: AppFlowy for a collaborative workspace, Logseq for a local-first knowledge system, and Trilium Notes for a deeply hierarchical personal knowledge base. Pick based on your preferred workflow and ownership model, not on whichever project has the largest README screenshot.
Why people are leaving Evernote in 2026
Evernote’s free tier has been cut down to one device and 50 notes. That is a particularly awkward limit for a note-taking product, because the whole point is usually to capture something on the device you happen to have in front of you and keep a growing archive rather than periodically prune it. Once the free plan stops being useful for ordinary multi-device use, the upgrade prompt becomes less of a nudge and more of the product experience.
The entry paid tier starts at $10.99 per month, billed monthly in USD. That is the entry paid tier, not a universal cost for every individual or professional setup, but it is still enough to make the “I just need somewhere to put notes” use case feel expensive. The price increase matters because Evernote is competing with tools that either have a generous free path or let users run the software themselves.
There are also the less visible reasons to look elsewhere: concerns about data ownership and recurring performance complaints. Moving away from Evernote is therefore not only a pricing decision. It is a decision about whether your archive should remain tied to a hosted vendor, whether you want the option to self-host, and whether you can tolerate a more opinionated interface in exchange for more control.
The alternatives that matter
AppFlowy
AppFlowy is the closest fit if your Evernote replacement needs to grow into a shared workspace. It positions itself as an open-source alternative to Notion, bringing projects, wikis, teams, and AI into one product. That makes it less of a pure notebook replacement and more of a broader workspace: useful if notes are connected to projects and collaboration, potentially excessive if you mostly want a fast personal scratchpad. It offers both self-hosting and an official cloud option, so you can choose between operational control and a managed experience.
Live metrics: 75,885 stars, AGPL-3.0 license, last pushed 2026-08-11.
AppFlowy’s official SaaS price is $10 per month, which puts its hosted entry point in roughly the same conversation as Evernote’s $10.99 monthly entry paid tier. That does not make the products equivalent, and it does not turn self-hosting into a free lunch: running software means handling deployment, updates, backups, and access. Still, the open-source option gives you a more credible escape hatch if vendor lock-in is the part of Evernote you dislike.
Pick AppFlowy if you want notes alongside projects, wikis, and team work, and you like the idea of a Notion-shaped workspace with an open-source foundation. Skip AppFlowy if you are looking for a deliberately simple personal notebook or you do not want your note-taking tool to turn into another productivity operating system. The project has an impressive star count, but nearly 1,000 open issues is a reminder that popularity and finished polish are not the same thing.
Logseq
Logseq takes a more knowledge-management-oriented route. It is a privacy-first, open-source platform for knowledge management and collaboration, and its strongest conceptual distance from Evernote is the emphasis on connected thinking rather than a conventional stack of notebooks and pages. It supports self-hosting and an official cloud option, which gives it a reasonable middle ground between local control and convenience. The interface and workflow are more opinionated than Evernote’s familiar note-and-folder model, so expect to change how you capture and retrieve information.
Live metrics: 44,576 stars, AGPL-3.0 license, last pushed 2026-08-23.
Logseq’s official SaaS price is $5 per month. That is a hosted product price, not a claim that every feature or usage pattern costs exactly that amount, and self-hosting still comes with its own maintenance work. The project is written in Clojure and has 959 open issues, so this is not a tiny abandoned side project, but it is also not a signal to expect every edge case to be frictionless.
Pick Logseq if you want a privacy-first knowledge base and are willing to adopt a more structured, linked approach to notes. It is a strong choice for people who think in outlines, references, and long-running personal research. Skip Logseq if your priority is a conventional Evernote-style experience with minimal workflow retraining, or if your team needs a straightforward shared workspace before it needs a knowledge graph. Logseq can replace the role of Evernote, but it does not need to imitate Evernote to be useful.
Trilium Notes
Trilium Notes is the most focused option of the three. It is a hierarchical note-taking application built around large personal knowledge bases, which makes it a natural fit for users whose Evernote archive is essentially a serious private library. It is self-hosted only, according to the available project data, so there is no official cloud option to smooth over the operational side. That trade is explicit: more control over where the application runs, and more responsibility for keeping that installation available and backed up.
Live metrics: 2,928 stars, AGPL-3.0 license, last pushed 2025-06-24.
Trilium Notes does not have a publicly listed official SaaS price. That is not a hidden bargain; it reflects the fact that the listed hosting option is self-hosting rather than a priced hosted subscription. Its TypeScript codebase has just 1 open issue, and the project was last pushed on 2025-06-24, so the visible issue queue is refreshingly small while the last-push date is materially older than the other candidates.
Pick Trilium Notes if your main requirement is a large, structured personal knowledge base and you are comfortable running it yourself. Its hierarchy-first position is more compelling than trying to force a collaborative workspace to behave like a private archive. Skip Trilium Notes if you want managed hosting, team collaboration, or the least possible migration and maintenance work. It is the practical choice for a specific kind of note hoarder, not the universal answer to Evernote.
Decision framework
- If you want projects, wikis, and team collaboration -> pick AppFlowy.
- If you want a privacy-first, linked knowledge workflow -> pick Logseq.
- If you want a large personal hierarchy and self-hosting -> pick Trilium Notes.
- If you want an official cloud option without giving up an open-source path -> pick AppFlowy or Logseq.
- If you want the closest simple Evernote replacement with no workflow change -> none of these is a perfect one-for-one swap.
- If you are unwilling to maintain a server or manage backups -> avoid the self-host-only Trilium Notes.
What to watch for
Migration is where the fantasy of “just switch apps” usually meets the archive. Export your Evernote data before committing to a replacement, then test the export with a representative sample: plain notes, attachments, notebooks, tags, dates, and anything you rely on every week. The important question is not whether an alternative can import a few notes. It is whether it preserves enough of your existing structure that the archive remains searchable and usable after the move.
Feature gaps are also more important than star counts. A tool built around hierarchical knowledge management may handle a large personal archive well while feeling wrong for team work; a workspace product may cover collaboration while adding more machinery than a private notebook needs. Self-hosting introduces another migration concern: the data may be yours, but availability, backups, updates, and recovery become your responsibility. AppFlowy and Logseq offer official cloud options as well as self-hosting, while Trilium Notes is listed as self-host-only, so that distinction should be settled before you move anything important.
The sensible approach is to run a short trial with a copy of your archive, not to migrate your entire digital life on a Friday afternoon. Check capture speed, search, attachments, mobile or multi-device behavior, and whether you can get your data back out again. Evernote’s restrictions may be the reason you leave, but a replacement that turns ordinary note-taking into an unpaid infrastructure project is not automatically an upgrade.
Ready to deploy?
The self-host options above all run cleanly on modern VPS providers. Our recommended stack:
Some links are affiliate. DigitalOcean, Vultr and Cloudways are hosts we run production workloads on; Hostinger we list on spec, not experience. Independent from OSS rankings above. Prices checked 25 Jul 2026 (Cloudways: DigitalOcean Basic, Standard CPU).